.jpeg)
NEITI also announced that it had commenced a study to
determine the actual consumption of petrol in Nigeria, stressing that the high
PMS consumption figures being released by some agencies of government were not
correct.
The Executive Secretary, NEITI, Ogbonnaya Orji, disclosed
this in Abuja while speaking to journalists on the sidelines of the
Stakeholders Validation Workshop on the 2022 Annual Progress Report for
Nigeria’s Extractive Industries.
“For a very long time, my disposition has been for the removal
of subsidy. And this government, right from day one has taken that bold step.
There shouldn’t be any going back.
“We should move forward from there and then put in place a
robust arrangement that will show a clear departure from the way and manner we
have operated under subsidy. Nigerians want to see what will change when the
subsidy is no more.
“And we have highlighted this because we know that subsidies
put a lot of impediments on transparency and accountability in the management
of revenues from the oil and gas industry over the years,” he stated.
Orji stated that NEITI knew that subsidy removal would throw
up a lot of other issues, adding that “one of those issues that we know will
happen is the actual consumption figure (of petrol).”
He said, “We believe that the figures that are being thrown
up as daily consumption of PMS in Nigeria are not very correct. We think we
need to have an empirical figure and that is why NEITI is commissioning a study
on the actual PMS consumption in Nigeria.
“We have every reason to believe that the figure may be less
than what is being projected and the removal of subsidy has also removed all
the incentives for hiking this figure in a manner that lacks empirical and
logical reason.
“So the removal of subsidy will remove a lot of opacity and
suspicion in budgeting based on estimates. That is why subsidy removal is a
very fundamental policy shift that needs to be sustained.”
The NEIT boss, however, stated that some steps should be put
in place to cushion the immediate effects that subsidy removal had brought to
bear on the very vulnerable less privileged poor, who were spread across the
working and non-working class.
“We just need the impact of this subsidy removal to reflect
in the improvement of the general well-being of Nigerians and in our social
infrastructure,” he stated.
On where to invest subsidy savings, Orji said, “We had
suggested that subsidy should be removed. Now it has been removed. We are now
pleading and requesting that a robust arrangement be put in place to show
Nigerians the impact of subsidy removal in terms of roads built,
infrastructure, access to health, education, etc.
“The savings from this subsidy should be visibly impactful
in the lives of NIgerians, and that is where all of us must take responsibility.
NEITI has a responsibility working with the media in this direction.”
Speaking on the validation workshop, Orji explained that the
global Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative requirement 7.4 under its
2019 standard (now requirement 1.5 under its 2023 standard) mandated all
implementing countries, including Nigeria to document their review of impacts
and outcomes of the EITI implementation.
He said the documentation was being done in an annual
progress report or through other means as might be agreed by the
Multi-Stakeholders Group.
“The global body also requires that all stakeholders –
companies, government and civil society involved in the EITI process, including
those not on the MSG, should be able to participate in reviewing the impact of
EITI implementation, provide feedback, and have their views reflected in the
annual progress report.
“Therefore, this programme has been designed to consult with
you, seek your inputs and have your views reflected in the 2022 the Annual
Progress Report of the Nigeria extractive industries in line with the
requirements of the global EITI,” he stated.