Kate Roland
Nigeria attracted a total of $16.7 billion in capital importation within the first nine months of 2025, according to newly released figures from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). The data shows that $11.1 billion of that amount came in during the second and third quarters alone, reports that had been delayed for nearly six months before their eventual publication.
The latest release confirms that capital inflows have remained elevated throughout the year. The country recorded $5.64 billion in the first quarter, followed by $5.12 billion in the second quarter, representing a mild dip. Momentum picked up again in the third quarter, with inflows rising to $6.01 billion, a 17.5 percent increase quarter-on-quarter. At $16.78 billion year-to-date, total inflows have already surpassed the $12.32 billion recorded in the whole of 2024, suggesting a notable rebound in foreign investor activity.
Yet beneath the strong headline figures lies a more complex picture about the nature and sustainability of these inflows. Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI) continues to account for the overwhelming majority of capital entering the country. In the third quarter alone, portfolio flows reached $4.85 billion, representing more than 80 percent of total capital importation. Over the nine-month period, portfolio investments exceed $14 billion, making up more than 97 percent of total inflows.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), often regarded as a more stable and growth-enhancing form of capital, remains comparatively modest. FDI rose gradually from $126 million in the first quarter to $143 million in the second, before improving to $296 million in the third quarter. Even cumulatively, however, FDI remains below $600 million for the year, a small fraction of overall inflows. The imbalance underscores Nigeria’s continued reliance on short-term, yield-driven capital rather than long-term productive investment tied to factories, infrastructure or large-scale enterprise development.
The delayed release of the second and third quarter data had earlier fueled questions about transparency. For months, only first-quarter figures were publicly available, even as senior government officials referenced strong capital importation numbers in public engagements. At one point, figures of roughly $21 billion for the first ten months of 2025 were cited as evidence of a dramatic recovery from the weaker inflows recorded in 2023 and 2024. Without quarterly breakdowns, however, investors were left without clarity on the composition and sectoral distribution of those funds.
The newly published sectoral data reveals that most inflows have been concentrated in financial services. Banking alone attracted more than $3.1 billion in each of the first three quarters, accounting for over half of total capital importation in every period. The financing sector followed a similar pattern, drawing $2.10 billion in the first quarter, moderating in the second, and rebounding strongly to $1.86 billion in the third quarter. Together, banking and financing have consistently absorbed between 70 and 80 percent of total inflows.
Outside the financial sector, capital importation has been more modest and uneven. Manufacturing recorded a rise to $261 million in the third quarter, while telecommunications increased steadily to $209 million over the same period. The electrical sector experienced a notable spike in the second quarter, and agriculture saw fluctuating inflows ranging between $24 million and $67 million. Oil and gas, despite its size and strategic importance to the economy, attracted relatively limited new capital, while sectors such as technology, health, construction and real estate remained comparatively small recipients.
The current surge in portfolio-driven inflows echoes a similar episode in 2019, when tight monetary policy by the Central Bank of Nigeria drew substantial foreign funds into fixed income and money market instruments. That period of strong inflows proved short-lived. As monetary conditions shifted and the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global markets, capital quickly exited emerging economies, including Nigeria, leading to significant currency pressures and the eventual collapse of the long-defended ₦360/$1 exchange rate band.
The experience offers a cautionary reminder that yield-seeking capital can reverse rapidly in response to policy adjustments or global shocks. While the 2025 figures signal renewed investor appetite and improved liquidity conditions, the dominance of short-term portfolio investment raises questions about how much of the inflow will translate into durable economic expansion.
For Nigeria to sustain growth, analysts argue that capital must increasingly flow into productive sectors that generate employment, boost exports and expand industrial capacity. Until foreign direct investment gains stronger traction and inflows diversify beyond financial assets, the impressive headline numbers may remain vulnerable to the same volatility that has shaped previous cycles.
