Infantino’s remarks, made during a detailed interview with Sky News, come amid a growing debate over the politicisation of world football and the role of the sport’s governing body in global affairs.
‘He Objectively Deserves It,’ Says Infantino
Responding to fierce criticism over the award — first presented at the World Cup draw in Washington D.C. last December — Infantino insisted that Trump was a fitting recipient of the newly created honour. He said the prize was meant to celebrate individuals who have contributed to peace, and argued that Trump’s diplomatic efforts, including ratified ceasefires and brokering talks, merited recognition.
“Objectively, he deserves it,” Infantino told Sky News. “Whatever we can do to help peace in the world, we should be doing it.”
Infantino’s defence comes despite protests from rights groups and analysts who say the prize lacks transparency in its selection process and risks breaching FIFA’s political neutrality.
Boycott Talk, World Cup Politics
The interview also addressed suggestions that European teams, fans and political figures might boycott the 2026 World Cup in response to Trump’s policies on immigration, foreign relations and controversial remarks about territories such as Greenland. Infantino rejected the notion of a boycott, challenging why football should be singled out when political and commercial ties between nations continue despite disagreements.
“In our divided world, in our aggressive world, we need occasions where people can come, can meet around the passion [for football],” he said.
Broader Controversies and FIFA’s Stance
Infantino’s interview also covered other contentious issues, including the possible readmission of Russia into international football despite its ban following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. He said FIFA and UEFA would have to “look at” allowing Russian teams, especially at youth levels, arguing that bans have caused more frustration and hatred than reconciliation.
The FIFA president’s comments arrive alongside broader scrutiny of his leadership style and political engagements, with some observers raising concerns about FIFA’s neutrality standards — though the governing body has not publicly confirmed any formal ethics investigations.
Implications for the Sport
The controversy underlines deep tensions between sport, politics and global diplomacy on the eve of what promises to be one of the most politically charged FIFA World Cups in history. Observers say FIFA’s handling of the peace prize and tournament preparation could have lasting impacts on the sport’s international reputation and fan engagement worldwide.
Background: President Trump received the first FIFA Peace Prize at the World Cup draw while leaders from co-host nations joined FIFA officials in Washington, a high-profile moment that raised questions about the intersection of global sport and geopolitics.