Olufemi Adeyemi
Accumulated losses have continued to put pressure on the financial positions of several companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX), pushing some of them into negative net asset positions.
Nine quoted companies — Premier Paints Plc, Omatek Ventures Plc, NCR Nigeria Plc, Caverton Offshore Support Group Plc, Nigerian Enamelware Plc, RT Briscoe Plc, SCOA Nigeria Plc, Tripple Gee & Company Plc and Union Dicon Salt Plc — were found to have negative shareholders’ funds, according to an analysis of their financial data.
For these companies, liabilities have risen above the value of their assets, leaving shareholders with negative equity. The negative positions ranged from N225.98 million to N15.5 billion, highlighting the impact of accumulated losses and other financial pressures on their balance sheets.
The widest gap was recorded by Caverton Offshore Support Group, whose negative shareholders’ funds stood at N15.5 billion. RT Briscoe followed with N4.86 billion, while NCR Nigeria recorded N4.54 billion.
Omatek Ventures recorded negative shareholders’ funds of N2.73 billion, while Union Dicon Salt stood at negative N1.35 billion.
Other companies in the group were Nigerian Enamelware, with negative shareholders’ funds of N846.39 million; Tripple Gee & Company, N649.52 million; SCOA Nigeria, N563.76 million; and Premier Paints, N225.98 million.
What negative shareholders’ funds mean
Shareholders’ funds represent the residual interest of owners in a company after all liabilities have been deducted from its assets.
When shareholders’ funds turn negative, it means the company’s liabilities have exceeded the accounting value of its assets. In practical terms, accumulated losses and other charges have wiped out the shareholders’ equity recorded on the balance sheet.
Analysts, however, caution that negative equity should not automatically be interpreted as an immediate corporate collapse. The underlying causes, the company’s operating performance, cash-generating capacity and prospects for recapitalisation are all important in determining whether the situation can be reversed.
Weak ROE compounds concerns
The balance-sheet pressures are also reflected in the Return on Equity (ROE) recorded by most of the affected companies.
Based on trailing 12-month (TTM) net income figures, Caverton Offshore Support Group had an ROE of negative 143.9 per cent, while RT Briscoe recorded negative 69.1 per cent.
SCOA Nigeria posted an ROE of negative 40.9 per cent, while Tripple Gee & Company recorded negative 22.2 per cent despite posting a positive net income of N144.22 million in the last 12 months.
Union Dicon Salt recorded negative 5.9 per cent ROE, while Premier Paints and Omatek Ventures posted negative 2.2 per cent and 1.9 per cent respectively.
NCR Nigeria recorded negative 6.6 per cent ROE despite reporting positive net income of N294.92 million over the same period.
The NCR example highlights why analysts say investors should avoid relying on ROE as a standalone measure of corporate health.
Ordinarily, ROE measures the profit generated for every naira of shareholders’ equity and is widely used to assess how efficiently management deploys owners’ capital.
But when shareholders’ equity has been severely depleted or has moved into negative territory, interpreting ROE becomes considerably more difficult.
An analyst said: “A positive ROE does not necessarily mean that the balance sheet is healthy. Investors have to examine the quality of the earnings, the size and direction of shareholders’ funds, cash flow and the company’s ability to meet its obligations.”
Nigerian Enamelware raises fresh concerns
The latest financial statements of Nigerian Enamelware Plc provide a further indication of the challenges confronting some of the affected companies.
The company’s audited financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2026, filed with the NGX, showed that shareholders’ funds deteriorated to negative N808.88 million from negative N728.77 million in 2025.
Nigerian Enamelware also swung from a profit after tax of N15.48 million in the preceding year to a loss after tax of N80.11 million in 2026.
Revenue fell by nine per cent to N1.302 billion from N1.431 billion.
The deterioration was also reflected in the company’s net assets per share, which declined to negative N10.64 from negative N9.59 in 2025. The company did not recommend a dividend for the year.
Retained earnings stood at approximately negative N1.053 billion, while total liabilities were about N3.698 billion, compared with total assets of approximately N2.925 billion.
Despite the weak balance-sheet position, the company’s auditors issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements.
The board also said it had assessed the company as a going concern and had no reason to believe that it would not continue as a going concern during the following year.
The situation illustrates the distinction between negative shareholders’ funds and immediate insolvency. While negative equity is a significant warning signal, it does not by itself mean that a company has stopped operating or will necessarily fail in the short term.
Analysts call for recapitalisation, turnaround plans
Market analysts said companies with persistent negative shareholders’ funds must demonstrate credible strategies for rebuilding their capital bases and restoring sustainable profitability.
One analyst said companies in such circumstances should provide investors with clear evidence of how they intend to reverse the deterioration.
“Once accumulated losses have wiped out shareholders’ equity, the focus should shift to how the company intends to restore profitability and rebuild its balance sheet. Investors should examine whether the problem is temporary or structural,” the analyst said.
Depending on the circumstances, affected companies may need fresh equity injections, debt restructuring, asset sales, operational reforms or a combination of these measures.
Dividend prospects under pressure
The weak financial positions could also constrain the ability of the affected companies to reward shareholders through dividends.
Companies carrying significant accumulated losses and experiencing weak cash flows generally have less flexibility to distribute funds to shareholders, particularly where available cash is required for working capital, debt servicing, capital expenditure or balance-sheet restructuring.
For investors, analysts said, the sustainability of dividend payments should therefore be assessed alongside earnings, operating cash flow and the overall strength of the balance sheet.
Ahimie: Negative equity should be viewed in context
Commenting on the development, Fiona Ahimie, President of the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS), said investors should regard negative shareholders’ funds as a warning sign, while also examining the circumstances that produced the deterioration.
“Negative shareholders’ funds should certainly be viewed as a warning sign, but the context behind the negative position is very important.
“For shareholders, negative equity means that accumulated losses have eroded the company’s net asset position and, if sustained, can limit the company’s ability to pay dividends and attract financing. However, investors should not look at the number in isolation. They need to understand whether the losses are structural or were driven by exceptional factors.
“For instance, during the significant naira devaluation and foreign exchange volatility from 2023, a number of Nigerian consumer and manufacturing companies recorded substantial foreign exchange losses. In some cases, these losses significantly weakened shareholders’ funds even though the underlying operating businesses remained viable. Some companies subsequently explored equity injections or debt-to-equity conversions to strengthen their balance sheets.
“The same consideration applies to relatively new businesses, where negative equity may reflect the initial investment and losses incurred while the company is still building scale. What matters is whether the business has a credible path to profitability and positive cash flow.”
On the implications for companies, Ahimie added: “For companies, however, a persistent negative equity position cannot be ignored. It can weaken the balance sheet and reduce investor confidence. Management therefore needs to demonstrate a credible plan to restore profitability, strengthen the balance sheet and manage its financial risks.”
Adonri: Negative equity threatens viability
David Adonri, Managing Director of Highcap Securities Limited, took a more severe view of the implications of negative shareholders’ funds, linking the position to corporate viability.
“Negative shareholders fund (Net Assets) means that the enterprise is insolvent and not viable or may not continue as a going concern. Shareholders may either re-capitalize or downsize to rescue the business from failure.
“If the Return on Equity (ROE) is below the cost of funds or the average Internal Rate of Return (IRR) in the industry, it means that the company is not really competitive, profitable and viable. Shareholders are likely to exit their investment in such a company and migrate to other high yielding assets. Therefore, both negative shareholders fund and low ROE are clear threats of failure which must be addressed based on their root causes and tailor made remedial solutions.”
Omordion: Market rally should not mask corporate risks
Chief Operating Officer at InvestData Consulting Limited, Ambrose Omordion, warned investors against assuming that strong aggregate market performance necessarily translates into improved financial health for every listed company.
His comments come against the backdrop of gains in the NGX’s overall market capitalisation and All-Share Index, even as some individual companies continue to face substantial financial pressures.
“Market performance is not the same thing as corporate financial health. A rising index can coexist with companies that are losing money or operating with negative equity.
“For shareholders of the nine companies, the immediate concern is therefore not merely the direction of their share prices, but whether their respective businesses can restore profitability and rebuild shareholders’ funds,” Omordion added.
What investors should watch
Analysts said investors should pay close attention to several indicators when assessing the prospects of companies with negative equity.
These include revenue growth, gross and operating margins, cash generated from operations, borrowings, interest expenses, retained earnings and movements in shareholders’ funds.
Investors should also examine management’s turnaround or recapitalisation plans and determine whether those plans are realistic and adequately funded.
For companies with severely weakened balance sheets, rebuilding shareholders’ funds could require fresh capital, restructuring of existing debt, disposal of non-core assets, stronger operational efficiency or a combination of several measures.
Ultimately, analysts said, the critical question for investors is whether the negative equity represents a temporary setback that can be reversed or a deeper structural problem that threatens the long-term viability of the business.
