Helen Aremu

Health professionals condemn alleged “permanent cure” claim, warn that delaying emergency treatment could cost lives.

A viral video showing a traditional practitioner subjecting a man identified as a stroke patient to intense heat has sparked widespread outrage and renewed debate over the dangers of unproven treatments for medical emergencies.

The footage, reportedly recorded at Ezekwueche Clinic Center in a rural Nigerian setting, shows a shirtless man undergoing what appears to be a heat-based procedure. The practitioner applies what appears to be a heated cloth or fire-related instrument to several parts of the patient's body, including his back, neck, spine and limbs.

At several points in the footage, the man appears to grimace and recoil from the heat, suggesting significant discomfort during the procedure.

The video was circulated on X with a claim that Africans use fire to “permanently cure stroke.” It reportedly attracted more than 1.4 million views within hours, prompting intense arguments online about traditional medicine, alternative therapies and the risks associated with delaying conventional medical treatment.

Among those to condemn the practice was popular Nigerian doctor and health educator Aproko Doctor, who described it as “plain wickedness.”

The doctor explained that stroke is a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked or when a blood vessel in the brain ruptures.

According to him, suspected stroke requires immediate medical assessment, brain imaging and appropriate treatment rather than the application of fire or extreme heat to the body.

Other doctors and health professionals also raised concerns about the footage, warning that exposing a vulnerable patient to intense heat could cause burns and other injuries while potentially wasting valuable time that could otherwise be spent obtaining emergency medical care.

‘Time is critical’

Medical professionals say the greatest concern surrounding unproven stroke treatments may extend beyond the immediate physical harm caused by the procedure.

They warn that a person experiencing a stroke may be taken to a traditional practitioner first, losing precious time before reaching a hospital.

A stroke occurs when blood supply to part of the brain is interrupted, commonly because of a clot, or when a blood vessel in the brain ruptures. Without adequate oxygen and nutrients, brain cells can begin to suffer damage rapidly.

This is why doctors repeatedly stress that time is critical in stroke management.

Once a patient reaches a hospital, doctors can conduct appropriate examinations and use brain imaging, including a CT scan or MRI where available, to determine the type of stroke and guide treatment.

For some patients with an ischaemic stroke caused by a clot, clot-dissolving medication may be appropriate if they arrive within the required treatment window. Patients with certain large-vessel blockages may also be candidates for mechanical thrombectomy, a procedure in which doctors remove the clot.

Such interventions require professional assessment and cannot safely be replaced with unproven procedures.

Doctors also point out that not every stroke is the same. A treatment that might be considered for a clot-related stroke could be inappropriate or harmful in a patient suffering bleeding in the brain.

Only medical evaluation and appropriate brain imaging can establish the type of stroke and determine the safest course of treatment.

Social media debate

Despite the medical concerns, some social media users defended the practitioner and the treatment shown in the video.

Some cited traditional beliefs, while others shared personal accounts involving relatives who they claimed experienced improvement after undergoing similar procedures.

The original poster also circulated what was described as BBC Pidgin coverage of the practitioner, who reportedly believes stroke can have both medical and spiritual dimensions.

Medical professionals, however, caution that individual testimonials cannot establish whether a treatment is effective or safe.

They say a person's improvement after receiving a particular treatment does not necessarily prove that the treatment caused the recovery, particularly when the underlying medical condition and other interventions have not been scientifically evaluated.

The distinction is especially important when claims are made that a procedure can “permanently cure” stroke.

Traditional medicine debate returns

The controversy has also reopened a longstanding conversation in Nigeria and across other African countries about the place of traditional healing alongside modern healthcare.

Traditional practitioners continue to play an important role in many communities, particularly where hospitals, specialist doctors, diagnostic facilities and emergency services are difficult to access or too expensive for some families.

For many people, traditional healers are trusted members of their communities, and cultural beliefs can strongly influence decisions about illness and treatment.

Medical professionals say, however, that traditional practices should not be presented as substitutes for emergency medical care when someone develops potentially life-threatening symptoms.

They argue that traditional and modern healthcare can coexist more safely when cultural practices do not discourage patients from obtaining proper diagnosis and evidence-based treatment.

Fire is not an established stroke cure

While controlled heat therapy can have limited applications in rehabilitation for certain muscle and joint conditions, doctors distinguish such supervised therapeutic uses from applying intense heat or fire to the body of someone experiencing an acute stroke.

There is no established scientific evidence that applying fire or extreme external heat can reverse the brain damage caused by a stroke.

Health professionals are particularly concerned about practices that expose patients to burns or other injuries while giving families the impression that a life-threatening neurological condition can be treated outside an appropriate medical facility.

The danger, they say, is compounded when such claims circulate widely on social media, where dramatic videos and personal testimonials can spread much faster than accurate medical information.

Recognising the warning signs

Doctors urge members of the public to treat sudden neurological symptoms as an emergency.

Warning signs can include sudden weakness or numbness, particularly on one side of the body; facial drooping; difficulty speaking or understanding speech; sudden vision problems; dizziness; and loss of balance.

When such symptoms appear, families are advised not to wait for them to disappear or rely solely on traditional remedies.

The priority should be to get the affected person to an appropriate medical facility as quickly as possible.

As the controversial video continues to circulate online, health professionals are urging social media users to be cautious about sharing unverified claims about stroke cures and to recognise that, in stroke care, the time lost before proper treatment can have consequences far more serious than the controversy generated by a viral video.