In our new study, we investigated how video games affect the
minds of children, interviewing and testing more than 5,000 children aged ten
to 12. And the results, published in Scientific Reports, will be surprising to
some.
Children were asked how many hours a day they spent on
social media, watching videos or TV, and playing video games. The answer was: a
lot of hours. On average, children spent two and a half hours a day watching
online videos or TV programmes, half an hour socialising online, and one hour
playing video games.
In total, that's four hours a day for the average child and
six hours for the top 25 per cent – a large portion of a child's free time. And
other reports found that this has increased dramatically over the decades.
Screens were around in previous generations, but now they truly define
childhood.
Is that a bad thing? Well, it's complicated. There could be
both benefits and drawbacks for the developing minds of children. And these
might depend on the outcome you are looking at. For our study, we were
specifically interested in the effect of screen time on intelligence – the
ability to learn effectively, think rationally, understand complex ideas, and
adapt to new situations.
Intelligence is an important trait in our lives and highly
predictive of a child's future income, happiness and longevity. In research,
it's often measured as performance on a wide range of cognitive tests. For our
study, we created an intelligence index from five tasks: two on reading
comprehension and vocabulary, one on attention and executive function (which
includes working memory, flexible thinking and self-control), one assessing
visual-spatial processing (such as rotating objects in your mind), and one on
learning ability over multiple trials.
This is not the first time someone has studied the effect of
screens on intelligence, but research, so far, has produced mixed results. So,
what's special this time? The novelty of our study is that we took genes and
socioeconomic backgrounds into account. Only a few studies so far have
considered socioeconomic status (household income, parental education and
neighbourhood quality), and no study had accounted for genetic effects.
Genes matter because intelligence is highly heritable. If
unaccounted for, these factors could mask the true effect of screen time on
children's intelligence. For example, children born with certain genes might be
more prone to watch TV and, independently, have learning issues. The lottery of
genetics is a major confounder in any psychological process, but until recently
this has been hard to account for in scientific studies due to the heavy costs
of genome analysis and technological limitations.
The data we used for our study is part of a massive data
collection effort in the US to better understand childhood development: the
Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development project. Our sample was
representative of the US in terms of sex, race, ethnicity and socioeconomic
status.
We found that when we first asked the child at age ten how
much they played, both watching videos and socialising online were linked to
below-average intelligence. Meanwhile, gaming wasn't linked with intelligence
at all. These results of screen time are mostly in line with previous research.
But when we followed up at a later date, we found that gaming had a positive
and meaningful effect on intelligence.
While children who played more video games at ten years were
on average no more intelligent than children who didn't game, they showed the
most gains in intelligence after two years, in both boys and girls. For
example, a child who was in the top 17 per cent in terms of hours spent gaming
increased their IQ about 2.5 points more than the average child over two years.
This is evidence of a beneficial, causal effect of video
games on intelligence. This result fits with previous, smaller studies, where
participants are randomly assigned to video-game playing or a control group.
Our finding is also in line with parallel lines of studies suggesting that
cognitive abilities aren't fixed, but can be trained – including studies with
cognitive training intervention apps.
What about the other two types of screen activities? Social
media did not effect the change in intelligence after two years. The many hours
of instagramming and messaging did not boost children's intelligence, but it
was not detrimental either. Finally, watching TV and online videos showed a
positive effect in one of the analyses, but no effect when parental education
was taken into account (as opposed to the broader factor of “socioeconomic
status”).
So this finding should be taken with a grain of salt. There
is some empirical support that high-quality TV/video content, such as the
programme Sesame Street, has a positive effect on children's school performance
and cognitive abilities. But those results are rare.
When thinking about the implications of these findings, it
is important to keep in mind that there are many other psychological aspects
that we didn't look at, such as mental health, sleep quality and physical
exercise. Our results should not be taken as a blanket recommendation for all
parents to allow limitless gaming. But for those parents bothered by their
children playing video games, you can now feel better knowing that it's
probably making them a tad smarter.