The International Monetary Fund (IMF) states that taxes are designed to generate revenue for government spending on goods and services that citizens require.

Consequently, it is crucial for a nation to establish a tax system that is both efficient and equitable.

However, developing countries face significant challenges in achieving this, particularly as they seek to integrate into the global economy.

Taxes can be collected through various means, including personal and corporate income taxes, value-added taxes, excise taxes, and import tariffs.

This discussion will focus specifically on tariffs, which many African nations view as a more straightforward solution given their heavy reliance on imports.

An import tariff is a tax imposed on the value of imported goods, which includes freight and insurance costs. The primary functions of tariffs are to generate government revenue, protect domestic products from foreign competition, and prevent an influx of foreign goods into the local market.

In many African nations, tariffs are likely to be utilized mainly for revenue generation due to the limited capacity for local manufacturing.

Is it appropriate for international financial institutions to recommend that African countries increase tariffs? Advocates of free trade contend that import tariffs place a burden on consumers by raising prices, provoke retaliatory measures from trading partners, and create inefficiencies in both consumption and production.

This inefficiency arises when local producers operate at higher costs than imported goods, resulting in consumers losing the benefits of lower prices. Consequently, tariffs can hinder the industrial performance of exporting countries, leading to potential retaliatory actions.

Countries are increasingly focused on achieving globalization and integrating into the international economy. In this context, tariffs may serve as a form of sanctions.

A pertinent example is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which, despite its well-meaning objectives, led to intense competition between the United States and China, resulting in elevated tariffs that severely impacted the global financial system and created significant challenges for other nations.

Moreover, if African nations decide to increase tariffs, they may inadvertently establish barriers to entry that could be advantageous in some respects but may also foster monopolistic conditions, as only the most competitive companies would survive.

This scenario could restrict opportunities for small foreign enterprises and startups, exacerbating competition and negatively affecting livelihoods and national economies that rely on diverse investments for growth.

Consequently, higher import tariffs could contribute to increased unemployment and further strain domestic economies.

African nations should explore alternatives to traditional institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank. One option could be to adopt the Chinese model of globalization, seeking loans from the China Exim Bank and joining BRICS.

Notably, a significant volume of agricultural trade is now occurring outside the US dollar framework, indicating a major transformation in global finance.

This shift is moving away from the traditional trading centers of New York, Chicago, and London towards a multipolar system characterized by bilateral trade agreements utilizing East African currencies and non-USD pricing and contracts.