THE Congress for Progressive Change on Monday called for the
trial of former President Olusegun Obasanjo for genocide over the 1999 invasion
of Odi community in Bayelsa State.
Spokesman for the CPC, Rotimi Fashakin, said, sequel to the
court description of the 1999 attack on Odi by Nigerian soldiers as genocide,
Obasanjo should be arrested and tried before the International Criminal Court.
The CPC catalogued two instances of mistreatment of two
communities in the country and concluded that Obasanjo should be tried for the
Odi massacre because he “harboured sadistic and malevolent intent” in dealing
with the two communities.
A Federal High Court presided over by Justice Lambo Akanbi
on February 19, 2013 had ordered the Federal Government to pay N37.6 bn as
compensation to the people of Odi over the invasion of their community by armed
soldiers during the Obasanjo administration.
However the CPC said the payment of compensation as ordered
by the court was inadequate adding that the ex-President should be tried for
genocide.
Soldiers on the order of the Obasanjo government invaded Odi
on November 20, 1999 and destroyed the community over the killing of 10
policemen by a gang involved in the Niger Delta unrest of the period.
The party’s statement reads, “On 20th November, 1999, Chief
Olusegun Obasanjo, then President of Nigeria, authorised the invasion and
subsequent destruction of Odi community in Bayelsa State by the soldiers of the
Nigerian Army.
“After more than 12 years of delayed justice, the Nigerian
High Court Judge, Justice Lambo Akanbi, had described the invasion as
genocidal, reckless, brutish and gross violation of the rights of the victims
to life and ownership of property.
“In addition, the learned Judge ordered the Federal
Government of Nigeria to pay N37.6bn as compensation to the victims.
“In 2001, the same PDP-led regime of Chief Olusegun
Obasanjo, ordered the invasion of Zaki-Biam, a community in Benue State, by
soldiers with the same malevolent intent as the Odi invasion.
“Indeed, in a decided case in July 2007, the Federal
Government was ordered to pay N4.8 bn as compensation to the victims.
“Undoubtedly, it is clear from these two decided cases that
Obasanjo harboured sadistic and malevolent intent in dealing with the two
Nigerian communities.
“In the judgment on the class suit No.FHC/PH/CP/11/2000 on
the Odi invasion, Justice Lambo Akanbi ruled that the attack on the people of
Odi was genocidal, reckless, brutish and a gross violation of the rights of the
victims to life and ownership of property.
“In Article 5(1a) of the statute of the International
Criminal Court, genocide is a crime under the jurisdictional purview of the
Court.”
Fashakin went further
to explain that Article 6 (a-c) of the same statute explains that “For the
purpose of this Statute, ‘genocide’ means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or
religious group, as such (a) killing members of the group; (b) causing serious
bodily or mental harm to members of the group.”
He said that at the time of these infractions, the Nigerian
State was not in a state of war with these communities and that the action
typified the impunity and excessive show of executive recklessness that he
alleged the PDP-led regimes had unleashed on the nation in 13 years.
Fashakin said his party was of the opinion that no amount of
monetary compensation could fully assuage the sense of colossal loss of these
communities, whose rights to life, he said, were indecently trampled upon by
the Obasanjo regime.
He said, “It is equally our belief that, with the
establishment of the intent and content of the invasion as genocidal, the
course of Justice is best served if the head of the government at the material
time, that is, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, is formally arraigned before the
International Criminal Court for the crime of genocide.
“The wider implication of the arraignment shall be the
institution of constitutional order and decency among the ruling elite so that
the inalienable rights of the people to personal liberty and justice shall
remain sacrosanct.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment