In a pre-trial hearing, Kenneth Dintzer, speaking for the
Justice Department, gave the example of an executive who might say in a
self-assessment that Google has hit 85% market share in a certain area and his
or her goal is to increase it. Dintzer stressed that the government did not
want sensitive health or other personal information.
John Schmidtlein, who argued for Google, said he found it
hard to believe that a performance review would have information that would
break open an antitrust case. He also said he had "never heard" of
performance reviews being subpoenaed in an antitrust case.
Judge Amit Mehta said that he would like to see data from
personnel files of six people, and that he would read them and decide. "I
take the government at its word that there may be some relevance to these
files," he said.
The Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against
Google in October, alleging the company acted unlawfully to maintain its
position in search and search advertising on the internet.
A state antitrust case, filed in December, accused Google of
seeking to extend its dominance to devices like speakers, televisions and even
smart cars.
The two cases have been combined for pre-trial matters.
The next pre-trial conference was set for the end of June.
The federal case is expected to go to trial in September 2023. -Reuters