The Federal Aviation Administration said it was requiring
immediate inspections of some Max 9 planes operated by U.S. airlines or flown
in the United States by foreign carriers.
The FAA’s emergency order, which it said will affect about
171 planes worldwide, is the latest blow to Boeing over the Max lineup of jets,
which were involved in two deadly crashes shortly after their debut.
On Friday, a fuselage panel blew out on an Alaska Airlines
Boeing 737 Max 9 seven minutes after takeoff from Portland, Oregon. The rapid
loss of cabin pressure pulled the clothes off a child and caused oxygen masks
to drop from the ceiling, but miraculously none of the 171 passengers and six
members were injured. Pilots made a safe emergency landing.
Hours after the terrifying incident, Alaska Airlines
announced that it would ground its entire fleet of 65 Max 9s for inspections
and maintenance. CEO Ben Minicucci said Alaska expects the inspections to be
completed “in the next few days.”
Alaska said on Saturday that the affected areas on 18 of its
Max 9s were inspected during recent, intense maintenance work and were cleared
to return to carrying passengers.
Even the short grounding disrupted the airline — the Max 9
accounts for more than one-fourth of Alaska’s fleet — and its passengers. On
Saturday, Alaska canceled more than 100 flights, or 15% of its schedule, by
late morning on the West Coast, according to FlightAware.
United Airlines said it had inspected 33 of its 79 Max 9s,
and pulling the planes from service had caused about 60 canceled flights.
Photos showed a hole in the Alaska jet where an emergency
exit is installed when planes are configured to carry a maximum number of
passengers. Alaska plugs those doors because its 737 Max 9 jets don’t have
enough seats to trigger the requirement for another emergency exit.
The FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board said
they would investigate Friday’s incident.
Boeing declined a request to make an executive available for
comment. The company, based in Arlington, Virginia, issued a statement saying
it supported the FAA’s decision to require immediate inspections. Boeing said
it was providing technical help to the investigators.
Analysts said the extent of the damage to Boeing’s brand
will depend on what investigators determine caused the blowout.
Richard Aboulafia, a longtime aerospace analyst and
consultant, said if the blowout is traced to a manufacturing issue it would put
more pressure on Boeing to change its processes, and cash-generating deliveries
of new planes could be slowed.
Aboulafia said, however, he doesn’t expect any change in
Boeing’s sales of the planes “unless the situation is worse than it seems.”
Airlines are snapping up new, more fuel-efficient planes from Boeing and Airbus
to meet strong demand for travel coming out of the pandemic.
The plane involved in Friday’s incident is brand-new — it
began carrying passengers in November and has made only 145 flights, according
to Flightradar24, a flight-tracking service.
The Max — the Max 8 and Max 9 differ mainly in size — is the
newest version of Boeing’s venerable 737, a twin-engine, single-aisle plane
frequently used on U.S. domestic flights.
More than a decade ago, Boeing considered designing and
building an entirely new plane to replace the 737. But afraid of losing sales
to European rival Airbus, which was marketing a more fuel-efficient version of
its similarly sized A320, Boeing decided to take the shorter path of tweaking
the 737 — and the Max was born.
A Max 8 jet operated by Lion Air crashed in Indonesia in
2018, and an Ethiopian Airlines Max 8 crashed in 2019. Regulators around the
world grounded the planes for nearly two years while Boeing changed an
automated flight control system implicated in the crashes.
Federal prosecutors and Congress questioned whether Boeing
had cut corners in its rush to get the Max approved quickly, and with a minimum
of training required for pilots. In 2021, Boeing settled a criminal
investigation by agreeing to pay $2.5 billion, including a $244 million fine.
The company blamed two relatively low-level employees for deceiving the Federal
Aviation Administration about flaws in the flight-control system.
Robert Clifford, a Chicago lawyer who is representing
families of passengers killed in the Ethiopian crash, said Friday’s incident
raised questions of whether regulators were too quick to let Max planes return
to flying. He accused Boeing of putting profits over safety.
“This is a company that went from being the gold standard in
engineering expertise and precision to now a company that seems like it’s at
the bottom of the barrel,” he said.
Boeing has estimated in financial reports that fallout from
the two fatal crashes has cost it more than $20 billion. It has reached
confidential settlements with most of the families of passengers who died in
the crashes.
After a pause following the crashes, airlines resumed buying
the Max. But the plane has been plagued by problems unrelated to Friday’s
blowout.
Questions about components from suppliers have held up
deliveries at times. Last year, the FAA told pilots to limit use of an anti-ice
system on the Max in dry conditions because of concern that inlets around the
engines could overheat and break away, possibly striking the plane. And in
December, Boeing told airlines to inspect the planes for a possible loose bolt
in the rudder-control system.
A passenger on a Southwest Airlines jet was killed in 2018
when a piece of engine housing blew off and shattered the window she was
sitting next to. However, that incident involved an earlier version of the
Boeing 737, not a Max. -AP