Tension mounted after music executive and entrepreneur, Abiodun Osikoya, publicly shared a traffic violation ticket on his social media handle, alleging his vehicle had been captured speeding on the Third Mainland Bridge. His post reignited questions about the purpose of the ITS cameras, the transparency of enforcement, and the readiness of supporting infrastructure.
In response, the Lagos State Ministry of Transportation clarified that the speeding violation in question occurred along the Alapere axis, not on the Third Mainland Bridge. Officials confirmed that while ITS cameras have been installed on strategic routes across the city, including the bridge, those on the bridge itself have not yet been activated.
Commissioner for Transportation, Oluwaseun Osiyemi, emphasized that the ITS project is not intended as a punitive tool but rather as a step toward smarter, safer transportation. He noted that the system integrates advanced technologies such as automated speed detection, traffic monitoring, and data analytics to reduce accidents and encourage responsible driving behaviour.
Despite these assurances, some road users remain skeptical. Critics argue that the N50,000 fine imposed for speed limit violations is excessive, especially in light of the prevailing economic conditions and the national minimum wage of N70,000. Others pointed out the scarcity of visible speed limit signs and public education campaigns, suggesting the enforcement could easily be perceived as exploitative.
In several online forums and commuter discussions, Lagos residents have expressed a mix of support and frustration. While many agree on the need for improved road safety, they urge the government to match enforcement efforts with adequate infrastructure and robust awareness programmes. Calls have also been made for clearer communication on which routes are under surveillance and what speed limits apply.
The state government maintains that the broader goal is to modernize Lagos’s transport ecosystem through data-driven solutions, and that stakeholder engagement will continue as the ITS rollout progresses.
As the debate unfolds, the situation highlights a familiar challenge in urban policy: balancing innovation with inclusion, and enforcement with empathy.