By Aare Afe Babalola
The functions of the vice chancellor are stated in Section 9
of the University Act which read as follows:
Functions of the vice-chancellor: (1) The vice-chancellor
shall, in relation to the university, take precedence before all other members
of the university except the chancellor and, subject to section 6 of this Act;
except the pro-chancellor and any other person for the time being acting as
chairman of the Council.
(2) Subject to sections 7 and 8 of this Act and the
provisions of this Act relating to the Visitor, the vice-chancellor shall to
the exclusion of any other person or authority have the general function, in
addition to any other functions conferred on him by this Act or otherwise, of
directing the activities of the university, and shall be the chief executive
and academic officer of the university and ex-officio chairman of the Senate.
The provisions of older universities’ legislations are
similar. A careful reading of the relevant sections of all the universities
legislations in Nigeria shows that the functions of a vice-chancellor primarily
are: (a) To take precedence before all members of the university, except the
chancellor and pro-chancellor; (b) To have the general function of directing
the activities of the university; (c) To be the chief executive and academic
officer of the university; (d) To be ex-officio chairman of the Senate.
The vice chancellor is, therefore, expected to know
something about all aspects of the university. Literally, he must be a super
man. Vice chancellorship is a demanding role that is highly visible internally
and externally. He is expected to provide leadership academically,
administratively and socially to all the officers of the university. He is to
lead development activities including fund raising and the reinforcement of the
university reputation and scope.
He is to achieve the university’s objective in a timely,
inclusive and purposeful way. He should exercise leadership to secure a
sustainable financial base sufficient to allow the delivery of the university’s
mission, aims and objectives. In view of all the foregoing demands, a vice
chancellor should have strong academic credibility, intellectual curiosity,
sympathy for the values and culture of the university, including the students
and their concerns. A vice-chancellor should not confuse public office with
sources of making personal wealth. Indeed a corrupt vice-chancellor does not
make a good university leader.
A vice chancellor who is aware of these enormous functions
and responsibilities ought to derive enough joy and satisfaction from the
exalted position as vice chancellor. He should be so proud of the power and
responsibility bequeathed to him by virtue of his position as a vice chancellor
so much so that he should be able to consider his status higher than other
positions not only in the university campus, but also in the immediate
community and the country at large.
He should derive enough satisfaction from the job to enable
him shun other political appointments. As a successful legal practitioner, I
coveted and considered my status in my profession higher than that of any
political office holder so much so that I confidently and proudly refused
offers of appointment as Federal Minister four times. Unfortunately, as would
be shown later, the manner of appointment of vice chancellors reduces them to
mere civil servants which ipso facto reduces the pride associated with the high
position and makes them feel inferior and consequently ineffective in
performance.
It was Lord Lugard in 1926 who said, “… The African of this
race type loves the display of power but fails to realize his responsibility…”
What ails the Nigerian vice chancellor from achieving the laudable objectives
inherent in the powers and functions stated herein and which are the causes of
poor quality in our education system is the next item.
Government involvement in the appointment of vice
chancellors of public universities and the adverse effect on university
autonomy and sustainability of education: In appointing a vice chancellor, the
Governing Council of the university is required to recommend three candidates
of the members of the university which in its own wisdom appoints one of the
nominated persons without giving reasons.
In exercising this exclusive and dominant power, the Visitor
who does not have to give reason for rejecting the Council’s number one
candidate some of the time appoints the second or third candidate on the list
or appoints somebody outside the list. Both in fact and in law, the government
is the appointor of a vice chancellor of a public university. This constitutes
a serious dent on the coveted and conventional autonomy of the universities.
There is an adage which says “he who pays the piper dictates
the tune”. It is, therefore, no wonder that many vice chancellors of public
universities do not enjoy the independence of mind required to carry out their
functions. Consequently, vice chancellors take orders from above. There are
cases where vice chancellors receive letters from the top ordering them “to
admit” unqualified students or “appoint” unqualified teachers.
When I was the pro-chancellor of University of Lagos, my
vice chancellor, the late Prof. Oye Ibidapo-Obe brought to me letters from
Abuja directing that some unqualified students be admitted. I took the letters
from him and replied that admission to University of Lagos was strictly on
merit and not otherwise as long as I remained the pro-chancellor of the
University of Lagos. Only a pro-chancellor who did not beg for the job could do
that.
Governing councils: Another area of concern is the
constitution and powers of Governing Council. A University Council is the
governing and executive body of the university and it regulates all the affairs
of the university either by way of policy making or by executing the statutory
powers given to it under the Act. Unlike the Board of companies, corporate
governance cannot go on in a university in the absence of the Council. There is
statutory limit to what the vice chancellor can do alone.
He cannot, for instance, appoint or promote or discipline
principal and senior officers of the university single-handedly, nor dish out
contracts above amount fixed by law. Governing Councils, much like chancellors
and pro-chancellors, owe their existence to the provisions of the various Acts
of the universities. A perusal of these Acts will reveal that the following
functions are common to University Governing Councils: The Council of the
University is responsible for the administration and management of the affairs
of the university, including ensuring an effective system of internal control
and is required to present consolidated audited financial statements each
financial year.
The Council is responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the university and to enable it to ensure that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the university’s statutes; Ensure that there are appropriate financial and management controls in place to safeguard public funds and funds from other sources; ·Safeguard the assets of the university and to prevent and detect fraud; and Secure the economical, efficient and effective management of the university’s resources and expenditure.
To be concluded…
0 comments:
Post a Comment