Recent developments in American visa regulations have sparked alarm among fans, human rights advocates, and media observers. Entire delegations—comprising journalists, support staff, and spectators—are facing bureaucratic hurdles that could prevent them from entering the U.S., raising fears that some qualified teams may play before sparsely populated stadiums.
Of particular concern is the travel ban affecting up to 43 countries, several of which have national teams that could feature in the tournament. Iran, for instance, faces significant barriers for its fans and support staff, despite the team’s potential qualification. Critics argue that such policies not only alienate entire fanbases but also run counter to FIFA’s own commitments to inclusion, non-discrimination, and universal access.
While the United States remains a vital financial engine for the tournament, Canada is emerging as a viable fallback option. With a more stable and inclusive immigration framework, and a reputation for political neutrality, Canada may offer a more accommodating environment for the World Cup's global community.
The dilemma for FIFA is complex. On one hand, it must uphold its stated values around human rights and equitable access. On the other, it must navigate the geopolitical realities of its host nations without compromising the tournament’s logistical and commercial foundations.
No final decision has yet been made, but FIFA’s next steps are expected to signal how seriously it takes its mandate to promote a truly global and inclusive celebration of football.